News:

Welcome to the new (and now only) Fora!

Main Menu

Handmaid's Tale in Missouri?

Started by jimbogumbo, January 13, 2023, 10:10:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

marshwiggle

This raises an interesting question. Since a lot of standards for "professional dress" were from a time when all of the professionals were men, how should dress expectations for men change to be appropriate now?
It takes so little to be above average.

ciao_yall

What if a man wants to wear a kilt, in honor of his Scots-Irish heritage?

dismalist

The chamber's dress codes for men and women are identical:

"The dress code for women lawmakers now states that "proper attire for women shall be business attire, including jackets worn with dresses, skirts, or slacks, and dress shoes or boots."

"The current dress code for men states that "proper attire for gentlemen shall be business attire, including coat, tie, dress trousers, and dress shoes or boots."

There is no problem, except perhaps having a dress code at all. I suppose some think no rules are better than gender neutral rules.

Much ado about nothing.
That's not even wrong!
--Wolfgang Pauli

Parasaurolophus

Quote from: dismalist on January 13, 2023, 11:34:58 AM
The chamber's dress codes for men and women are identical:

"The dress code for women lawmakers now states that "proper attire for women shall be business attire, including jackets worn with dresses, skirts, or slacks, and dress shoes or boots."

"The current dress code for men states that "proper attire for gentlemen shall be business attire, including coat, tie, dress trousers, and dress shoes or boots."

There is no problem, except perhaps having a dress code at all. I suppose some think no rules are better than gender neutral rules.

Much ado about nothing.

That's not what 'identical' means. Perhaps you mean 'comparable' or 'equivalent'.
I know it's a genus.

dismalist

Quote from: Parasaurolophus on January 13, 2023, 12:51:57 PM
Quote from: dismalist on January 13, 2023, 11:34:58 AM
The chamber's dress codes for men and women are identical:

"The dress code for women lawmakers now states that "proper attire for women shall be business attire, including jackets worn with dresses, skirts, or slacks, and dress shoes or boots."

"The current dress code for men states that "proper attire for gentlemen shall be business attire, including coat, tie, dress trousers, and dress shoes or boots."

There is no problem, except perhaps having a dress code at all. I suppose some think no rules are better than gender neutral rules.

Much ado about nothing.

That's not what 'identical' means. Perhaps you mean 'comparable' or 'equivalent'.

Yes, "identical" slipped in for intent. "Comparable" or "equivalent" are better.
That's not even wrong!
--Wolfgang Pauli

Wahoo Redux

Quote from: dismalist on January 13, 2023, 01:23:50 PM
Quote from: Parasaurolophus on January 13, 2023, 12:51:57 PM
Quote from: dismalist on January 13, 2023, 11:34:58 AM
The chamber's dress codes for men and women are identical:

"The dress code for women lawmakers now states that "proper attire for women shall be business attire, including jackets worn with dresses, skirts, or slacks, and dress shoes or boots."

"The current dress code for men states that "proper attire for gentlemen shall be business attire, including coat, tie, dress trousers, and dress shoes or boots."

There is no problem, except perhaps having a dress code at all. I suppose some think no rules are better than gender neutral rules.

Much ado about nothing.

That's not what 'identical' means. Perhaps you mean 'comparable' or 'equivalent'.

Yes, "identical" slipped in for intent. "Comparable" or "equivalent" are better.

Glad that, once again, that Republicans have their priorities straight.
Come, fill the Cup, and in the fire of Spring
Your Winter-garment of Repentance fling:
The Bird of Time has but a little way
To flutter--and the Bird is on the Wing.

nebo113

Men decree that women should dress like men.  Weird.

marshwiggle

The history of men's professional and/or formal clothing choices have always been much more limited than women's. I remember reading a mystery where an important point in the plot was that at a black tie dinner, the male guests and the male waiters were essentially indistinguishable. There's no way that the female staff at a fancy dinner would be dressed like the female guests. This difference in expectation historically makes it challenging to consider dress codes for women in the workplace; a man's suit is a slightly less formal version of fancy dress. With the range of what women can wear as "fancy dress", what corresponds to the "slightly less formal version" for work?
It takes so little to be above average.

Anselm

There is a long history of courts of law requiring neckties for attorneys.  I have heard stories of defendants being made to wear them.  We could make everything easier and simple if we just had everyone wear black robes and powdered wigs. 
I am Dr. Thunderdome and I run Bartertown.

Antiphon1

There is a huge difference between laws, rules, and customs.  What is the historical evolution of these dress codes?  I'm curious about when dress codes were introduced into the Missouri legislative code and how these directives might have changed.  Is or was there a problem being addressed?  Granted, a female legislator casting a vote in her bikini might prove distracting to certain male colleagues, but then again, whose problem would that be, really?  Maybe the men of Missouri lack proper impulse control.  Who knew? 

nebo113

Shawls and cardigans are not acceptable.  Has to be a structured blazer or jacket.  Are jock straps next?

marshwiggle

Quote from: Antiphon1 on January 14, 2023, 10:09:28 PM
There is a huge difference between laws, rules, and customs.  What is the historical evolution of these dress codes?  I'm curious about when dress codes were introduced into the Missouri legislative code and how these directives might have changed.  Is or was there a problem being addressed?  Granted, a female legislator casting a vote in her bikini might prove distracting to certain male colleagues, but then again, whose problem would that be, really?  Maybe the men of Missouri lack proper impulse control.  Who knew?

Do you really want to see the male legislators in Speedos?

It takes so little to be above average.

Juvenal

Quote from: marshwiggle on January 15, 2023, 06:03:17 AM
Quote from: Antiphon1 on January 14, 2023, 10:09:28 PM
There is a huge difference between laws, rules, and customs.  What is the historical evolution of these dress codes?  I'm curious about when dress codes were introduced into the Missouri legislative code and how these directives might have changed.  Is or was there a problem being addressed?  Granted, a female legislator casting a vote in her bikini might prove distracting to certain male colleagues, but then again, whose problem would that be, really?  Maybe the men of Missouri lack proper impulse control.  Who knew?

Do you really want to see the male legislators in Speedos?

Depends who you ask.
Cranky septuagenarian

Antiphon1

Quote from: marshwiggle on January 15, 2023, 06:03:17 AM
Quote from: Antiphon1 on January 14, 2023, 10:09:28 PM
There is a huge difference between laws, rules, and customs.  What is the historical evolution of these dress codes?  I'm curious about when dress codes were introduced into the Missouri legislative code and how these directives might have changed.  Is or was there a problem being addressed?  Granted, a female legislator casting a vote in her bikini might prove distracting to certain male colleagues, but then again, whose problem would that be, really?  Maybe the men of Missouri lack proper impulse control.  Who knew?

Do you really want to see the male legislators in Speedos?

Sure.  Why not?  Parts is parts.